Home RSS Village Votes To Separate From UK To Fight Government Planned Migrant Invasion

Village Votes To Separate From UK To Fight Government Planned Migrant Invasion

0
5

Village Votes To Separate From UK To Fight Government Planned Migrant Invasion

Is the tide finally turning against the mass immigration agenda in Europe?  Events surrounding the tiny village of Piddington have spread like wildfire concerning UK government plans to relocate and house over 1200 third world migrants.  The golden horde will be dropped in the middle of the county of Oxfordshire at an old military base less than a mile from Piddington.  The total native population of Piddington is only 350 people.

The immigration action would completely overwhelm the community with foreigners, and, as in most cases where large numbers of migrants are transplanted, the risk of crime will skyrocket. In particular, women fear the constant threat of sexual assault if migrant men greatly outnumber the locals.   

Far-left politicians (and fake conservative politicians) in the UK have been pursuing an rapid program of cultural replacement over the past decade.  Leftists have consistently complained about the overt “whiteness” of rural communities and have sought to remedy this “problem” by erecting migrant hotels and other facilities right in the middle of quiet villages across the country. 

Once these migrant camps are finished, there’s no getting rid of them.  In most cases migrants roam freely away from their primary housing and often terrorize the surrounding communities.  One need only look at what’s happening in the Spanish enclave of Ceuta to see what happens when smaller towns are overwhelmed by third world groups.       

The people of Piddington say no more.  Out of the 312 resident voters, 285 (91%) have voted in favor of separating from the UK and becoming a principality.  Their goal is to block the establishment of any migrant facilities.  The vote, while mostly symbolic, signals a dramatic change in the often passive nature of common citizens. 

Not all the residents in Piddington are happy about the vote and the decision to fight back against the migrant invasion.  Liberals within these communities complain about “rising racism” while ignoring the numerous examples of crime that commonly follow third worlders as they flood into western countries.  UK officials and the media often work to undermine efforts to prevent migrant housing. 

In the past, left-wing NGOs have bused in mobs of activists from outside these villages to intimidate them into submission.  Public opinion, however, seems to be shifting substantially against the multicultural agenda.  England is for the English.  Ireland is for the Irish.  Scotland is for the Scottish.  No foreigner is entitled to access these lands and none of the native people are responsible for taking in the dregs of the third world.  

It is clear, though, that UK officials plan to ignore the wishes of these communities and charge forward with their plans.  The question is, how far are the people of the UK willing to go to stop this from happening?  

Villager Herbert Owen, 76, said after voting this week that the independence referendum “isn’t just about Piddington,” adding: “It means everything our grandparents, our parents fought for. Today is the Battle of Britain.”

Earlier this month, masked demonstrators blocked the port of Dover, in southeast England, and tried to stop a boatload of migrants being taken ashore in Portsmouth on the country’s south coast.

In the UK, as opposed to the US, the vast majority of immigration is “legal” and coordinated by the government.  It is an invasion, but an invasion being aided from within.  The assumption by leftists is that once the migrants are rooted in the UK there is nothing anyone can do.  Efforts of groups like the Restore Party aim to change this by promoting a remigration platform; the position is currently exploding in popularity. 

Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 – 04:15

This post was originally published on this site