News

Health Officials Stop Reporting Covid-19 Deaths

March 15, 2022

509

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has stopped mandatory hospital reporting of SARS-CoV-2 deaths. In the meantime, the CDC (Center for Disease Creation) is hiding data about the effectiveness of the booster genocide shots in people aged 18 to 64, or those least likely to benefit from the shots. The New York Post noted the FDA (Fraudulent Drug Administration) overruled an expert advisory committee and the CDC overruled their own experts to promote the booster to all age groups. Scientists must use Israeli data, which showed little to no difference in those boosted or not boosted until people are over 65. The CDC justified not releasing the data claiming it was “not ready for prime time,” as it would be misinterpreted. The information is based on 10% of the population, or the same sample size that has been used for influenza statistics for years. Data from independent researchers have demonstrated that the number of people who died in 2021 after the release of the genocide jab far exceeds the mortality rate in 2020 during the height of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is easy to understand why the CDC and FDA want to hide the data as it is more difficult to ignore with each passing day that the infection did not kill the number of people health officials claimed. Now, the genocide jab is killing far more than the virus is. Could the Covid-19 scamdemic be coming to an end?

Data is the foundation of scientific analysis. Without data, researchers are left unable to draw conclusions, which leaves public health experts unable to accurately make recommendations. However, that appears to be exactly what the CDC and HHS are doing. The CDC is hiding information and the HHS is no longer collecting data, which one U.S. health official has called “incomprehensible.” Since the World Health Organization (WHO) announced a plandemic, multiple organizations began tracking data, including the number of people who were sick with SARS-CoV-2, in the hospital with or had died from it. The number of “cases” were always reported, instead of the amount of people who were actually sick with Covid-19. This was a population who had a positive, fake PCR test and did not necessarily have symptoms.

Whistleblowers working with Thomas Renz, who is investigating hospital abuses (hospitals are the new “kill zones” for Covid-19), have reported that hospitals are incentivized to admit PCR positive patients, prescribe Remdesivir, place patients on ventilators, and include Covid-19 on death certificates. All told, hospitals could receive up to $100,000 for each patient who meets all incentivized criteria. Naturally, “fact” checkers immediately jumped on that claim in order to “debunk” what they call “false” information. But they simply contradicted themselves in the “fact” checking by changing the rules of how Covid deaths are counted and rewording of how hospitals are compensated for SARS-CoV-2 patients from “paid more” to receiving a “bump” in payment. So what is the difference? They are getting paid more for Covid patients. The HHS decision to hide SARS-CoV-2 data brings up the question: “What do they want to hide?” Are they stopping the flow of data, as opposed to hiding data, like the CDC, to reach the same end, where the data are not available for examination and analysis?

January 6, 2022, the HHS announced changes to the reporting requirements for hospitals and acute care facilities. The new guidelines note, “The retirement of fields which are no longer required to be reported,” which include the “previous days Covid-19 deaths.” However, according to one news report, the guidelines did not receive public attention until January 14, 2022, when it was tweeted by Dr. Jorge Caballero, who asked why the government no longer wanted these daily reports beginning February 2, 2022. By January 28, 2022, just like they did not report on SARS-CoV-2 hospital reimbursements, fact checkers were busy posting viral social media posts claiming Caballero’s conclusions were not correct. Yet, the announcement was published on the HHS website. So how could it be false? You can got to the website and read it for yourself. Under the section, “The retirement of fields which are no longer required to be reported,” it says: “previous days Covid-19 deaths.” So how could fact-checkers “debunk” that? To create a fact check that claimed this was “false,” the fact-checkers simply changed the headline. So, while the HHS publicly announced they would no longer require hospitals to report deaths from Covid-19, fact-checkers reported the U.S. government was not ending daily Covid death reporting. MSN fact-checkers reported that Nancy Foster from the American Hospital Association had suggested the change could “streamline data collection.” Yet, the HHS system used direct reporting from ICD (International Classification of Diseases) medical diagnosis codes entered into the electronic Medical Record (EMR) system. In an email statement, Foster claimed that she believes the HHS was no longer collecting data because they were receiving comprehensive data from public health agencies, including death certificates reported to the National Center for Health Statistics and used by the CDC in its mortality data reporting. Despite supporting the HHS decision, the agency did not respond to a request by MSN on the reason for the change. HHS had worked with major electronic medical records (EMR) manufacturers, so 85% of hospital reporting was programmed into their computer, and you cannot get more streamlined than that. January 2021, Alex Madrigal, co-founder of the Covid-19 Tracking Project, wrote: “In a series of analyses that we ran over the past several months, we came to nearly the opposite conclusion of other media outlets. The hospitalization data coming out of HHS are now the best and most granular publicly available data on the pandemic. This information has changed the response to the pandemic for the better.” An unnamed federal health official spoke with a reporter from WSWS, calling the move to stop reporting Covid-19 hospital deaths “incomprehensible.” The health official added: “It is the only consistent, reliable and actionable dataset at the federal level. Ninety-nine percent of hospitals report 100% of the data every day. I don’t know any scientists who want to have less data.”

February 20, 2022, The New York Times reported that the CDC has not published large parts of the data they collected during the COVID pandemic. In fact, most of the information they collected in the past year on hospitalizations has not been made public. The CDC published data on the effectiveness of the COVID-19 boosters in people younger than 65 in early February 2022. However, as The New York Times points out, the data did not cover individuals from 18 to 49 years old. This also is the group least likely to benefit from the genetic therapy shot, since CDC data demonstrate they have some of the lowest rates of severe disease and death. The New York Post notes that the FDA overruled an expert advisory committee and the CDC overruled their own experts to promote the boosters for all age groups. After ensuring the boosters would be open to all people, the CDC then did not release much of the data despite pleas from scientists. This agency is extremely corrupt and unethical. A look at the published data for those 50 to 65 years shows the booster reduces the risk of death from 4 in 1 million to 1 in 1 million. Further analysis shows that 75% of the additional three people out of 1 million who are helped by the booster shot have at least four comorbidities. Unfortunately, since the CDC has not released the raw data, U.S. scientists have had to rely on Israeli data. One study published in The New England Journal of Medicine gathered information from 4.6 million people 16 years and older who had received two doses of the Pfizer genocide jab. They then compared severe illness and death between those who had a booster dose and those who had not. The data showed the group of individuals from 16 to 29 years had zero deaths whether they were boosted or not boosted. Likewise, the group from 30 to 39 years had one death whether they were boosted or not boosted. In fact, the difference in death rate did not rise until the participants were 60 to 69 years, at which point the non-boosted group had 44 deaths and the boosted group had 32 deaths. In addition to the number of deaths rising in the boosted and non-boosted groups, the percentage of people in those age categories also declined, much like you would find in the general population where the death rate rises as people age.

Kristen Nordlund is a spokeswoman for the CDC. In her comments to The New York Times, she said the data are being slowly released since, “basically, at the end of the day, it’s not yet ready for prime time.” Another reason she cited was the information may be misinterpreted to mean the genocide jabs are ineffective. Nordlund gave a third reason for not releasing the data, saying that the data they have is based on 10% of the U.S. population, which the Times reporter points out is the same sample size used to track influenza each year. Jessica Malaty Rivera is an epidemiologist. She spoke with the Times, saying, “We have been begging for that sort of granularity of data for two years.” She went on to say, “We are at a much greater risk of misinterpreting the data with data vacuums, than sharing the data with proper science, communication and caveats.” In an opinion piece, Staten Island Advance’s Tom Wrobleski characterizes the CDC’s decision, writing about what has happened to most people who have been willing to speak out: “We’re told to have faith in the CDC, in Dr. Anthony Fauci, in all experts who are trained to handle public health crises. But we can’t have trust if vital information is withheld from us.” Wrobleski also mentioned that if you question the narrative, you are suddenly a dangerous person. He went in to say: “You’re likened to a terrorist. You’re told you want people to die. You get banned from social media. If you dare protest, you can have your bank account frozen and your vehicle insurance suspended.” With the end of the HHS Covid death reporting system, the only means of tracking Covid deaths will now rely on the collection of data from death certificates at the state level. Deaths are reported by the counties/states but the process is very slow and many coroners are actually not wanting to cite SARS-CoV-2 as the reason, while “hospitals rely on diagnoses.” The last part of the sentence may refer to the hospital incentives for a Covid diagnosis. Although the CDC and HHS would like the data to remain hidden, a cost-benefit analysis by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and independent researcher Kathy Dopp revealed that the genocide jab is deadlier than SARS-CoV-2 infection in anyone under the age of 80. The analysis looked at publicly available official U.K. and U.S. data, all age group under 50 years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving the genocide jab than an unjabbed person is at risk of Covid-19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a Covid-19 injection, and the younger ages incur significant risk. The analysis is conservative because it ignores the fact that inoculation-induced adverse events such as thrombosis, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, neurodegenerative disorders, and other jabbed-induced injuries “can lead to shortened life span.” In a previous article, I discussed how life insurance companies were seeing an increase in mortality in working-age Americans from 18 to 64 years in the third quarter of 2021 compared to pre pandemic levels. I will not discuss that again here.

It is easy to see why the HHS and corrupt CDC would like to hide these numbers from scrutiny. It is becoming more difficult to ignore with each passing day that SARS-CoV-2 infection did not kill the number of people health experts claimed. Obviously, the genocide jab is killing far more than the virus. The time for Nuremberg 2.0 with these nefarious agencies is now! May Yahweh bless all and be well.

Story Covered By: Ed J. Janicki