News

Massive Conflicts of Interest At The Fraudulent NIH

March 17, 2022

612

One of the primary vehicles for kickbacks and fraud seems to be foundations associated with federal agencies. The reason for this seems to be they are used for questionable transactions. Foundations are private entities and not subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and other open record laws. The board of directors of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) is heavily populated with criminal cartel Big Pharma players. This raises serious questions about conflicts of interest, as the foundation oversees the distribution of hundreds of millions of dollars, which are unregulated funds that typically go right back into the funds of the corrupt drug cartels. This conflict of interest also, at least In part, helps explain the actions of Fauci the Freemasons, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and now retired director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins. Both have gone out of the way to protect the makers of the Covid genocide jab and dismiss evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was created in and escaped from a laboratory. Dr. Julie Gerberding became the FNIH CEO March 1, 2022. She was formerly director of the U.S.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. After leaving the CDC, she became the executive vice president of strategic communications at Merck. The FNIH’s board of directors includes seven current or former drug company executives, the FDA (Fraudulent Drug Administration), the Sackler family (notorious for deadly OxyContin/opioid epidemic), John Hopkins (co-sponsor of Event 201, which “predicted” Covid-19 and the subsequent destruction of human rights), and two major investment banks, Goldman Sachs and BlackRock. What a wonderful bunch of demons this crew is! How is the Sackler family not doing life in prison for their crimes against humanity with the opioid crisis? This article will highlight and expose yet another way we are being conned and manipulated by examining the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), whose board is plastered with major Big Pharma players.

As mentioned above, this raises serious conflicts of interest, seeing how the foundation oversees the distribution of millions of dollars. The unregulated funds then go back into the drug manufacturing cartels, which is a clever strategy to extract even more funds from the American taxpayers. The FNIH board is a “who is who” of Big Pharma cartels. In 2020, Fauci received FNIH’s Charles A. Sanders MD Partnership Award for his leadership and support of “FNIH programs propelling research in lethal infectious diseases.” Too bad they don’t give out an award for best freemasonry hand symbols because I would nominate him. Dr. Charles Sanders was the FNIH chairman between 1996 and 2016. Before that he was the chairman and CEO of Glaxo Inc. He also spent eight years with Squibb Corporation, where he held several positions, including CEO of the Science and Technology Group. He is currently a member of the FNIH board of directors.

Another interesting member of the FNIH’s board is Dr. Julie Gerberding. She served as director of the CDC from 2002 to 2009. After resigning from the CDC, she entered the express revolving door between industry and government and was hired by Merck as their vice president in charge of “vaccines.” Imagine that, the head of a government agency responsible for policing “vaccines” is hired by one of the world’s largest producers of “vaccines.” Sadly, it is all perfectly legal. Later, she oversaw global public policy and strategic communications at Merck, followed by a position as chief patient officer and executive vice president for population health sustainability. Gerberding has now taken her nefarious behavior to an entirely new level. She has slid back yet through another revolving door and is the CEO of FNIH as of March 1, 2022. Other board member of include:

Chairman Dr. Steven Paul, CEO and chairman of Karuna Therapeutics
Marijn Dekkers, Ph.D., chairman of Novalis LifeSciences
Paul Herrling, Ph.D., chairman for the Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases
Dr. Paul Stoffels, vice chairman of the executive committee and chief scientific officer for Johnson and Johnson
Jillian Sackler, president and CEO of the Dame Jillian and Dr. Arthur M. Sackler Foundation for the Arts, Sciences, and Humanities
Dr. Elias Zerhouni, Professor Emeritus, Johns Hopkins University
James Donovan, a Goldman Sachs partner
Russel Steenberg, managing director and global head of BlackRock Private Equity Partners

The two non-voting directors are Collins and Dr. Stephen Hahn, the current commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration. This is quite a list! We have seven current or former drug company executives, the CDC, the FDA, Sackler family (notorious for the deadly OxyContin/opioid epidemic), John Hopkins, and two major investment bankers, Goldman Sachs and Black Rock. The inclusion of BlackRock is particularly interesting, and disturbing, considering they have a hidden monopoly on global asset holdings. Together with Vanguard, BlackRock has ownership in some 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion. If you add in the third-largest global asset holder, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms. Just what is BlackRock doing on FNIH’s board of directors?

Who funds the FNIH? Then there are donors. The largest donor to to the FNIH is none other than Bill Gates. According to the FNIH’s 2020 statutory report, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated $96,981,262 that year, accounting for 15% of the Foundation’s annual revenue. In 2019, the Gates Foundation’s contribution of $49,827,480 accounted for 35% of the annual revenue. As the top donor, it is not far fetched to assume Gates might have significant leverage over the direction of the foundation and its funds. GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson and Johnson, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Wellcome also donated between $5 million and $10 million each in 2020. FNIH programs funded by the Gates Foundation include but are not limited to:

Combining Epitope Based Vaccine Design with Informatics-Based Evaluation
Comprehensive Cellular Vaccine Immune Monitoring Consortium
Global collaborative for Coordination of Gene Drive Research and Development
The Partnership to Accelerate Novel TB Regimens
mRNA encoded HIV Env-Gag Virus-like-particle Vaccines

The last program on the list, the creation of novel mRNA-based HIV “vaccines,” is described as a project to “test a new HIV ‘vaccine’ concept in animals using non-infectious ‘virus-like particles’ encoded by an RNA ‘vaccine’ with the goal of inducing protective antibody response.”

The initial request for collaboration came from the NIAID at the end of July 2020. In August 2020, the FNIH Portfolio Oversight Committee approved the project, “contingent upon a commitment of full funding in the amount of $1.45 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.” The Gates Foundation fulfilled that commitment in October 2020. A memorandum of understanding between the FNIH and the NIAID was finalized in early 2021. A sub-award was granted to the University of Montreal (CHUM), and Bioqual was given a service agreement to manage the clinical trial. Bill Gates also contributes to the FNIH through Gates Ventures, a rapidly growing venture capital and investment firm that works side by side with the Gates Foundation’s program teams “to identify investment opportunities.” Specifically, Gates Ventures is an organizational donor to FNIH’s Biomarkers Consortium (BC), a cancer steering committee, alongside a long list of drug companies.

As mentioned earlier, all of this can explain Fauci’s and Collins’ behavior during the Covid-19 plandemic. Collins is a board member, Fauci the Freemason got the foundation‘s top award for support in 2020, and money flows into the foundation from drug companies and Gates, all of whom have vested interests in making sure that whatever the NIH does and recommends to the public, it will produce profits for them. The FNIH has raised more than $1.2 billion, and as mentioned earlier, most of the money goes right back to the criminal drug cartels, without Congressional appropriation or oversight. The whole thing is plagued by conflicts of interests, and it may be difficult to get to the bottom of this because, as of 501c3, the FNIH is cleverly exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Nonprofits are considered private entities, and therefore are not subject to FOIA and other open record laws. However, the NIH is subject to FOIA since it is a government agency. The funds raised go to the NIH. Basically, it is corrupt, unethical system set up to bypass oversight, and the U.S. Congress is responsible for creating this fraudulent, undesirable system.

Congress is responsible for the oversight of federal agencies, but in the early 1990s, it created what sure looks like a pay-to-play system. Not only did Congress develop the FNIH, they also set up the CDC Foundation, which funnels millions of dollars from drug companies and “vaccine” makers into the CDC. Most of these members of Congress are owned by the Big Pharma cartels, along with their endless stock options. This explains the CDC’s highly irrational and harmful Covid recommendations. The CDC has long bred the perception of independence by stating it does not accept funding from special interests. In disclaimers scattered throughout the CDC’s website and its publications, it says the agency “does not accept commercial support” and has “no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products.” The information in this article shows that it is a cleverly obscure pack of lies. The funds are diverted through the foundations rather than going straight to the CDC.

In 2019, several watchdog groups — including the U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), Public Citizen, Knowledge Ecology International, Liberty Coalition and the Project on Government Oversight — petitioned the CDC to stop making these false disclaimers because, in reality, the CDC receives millions of dollars each year from commercial interests through its government-chartered foundation, the CDC Foundation, which funnels those contributions to the CDC after deducting a fee. On the CDC Foundation’s website, you’ll find a long list of “corporate partners” that have provided the CDC with funding over the years. The CDC even accepts money earmarked for specific studies or programs aimed at expanding corporate profits or reducing drug cartel’s liability exposure. As just one example, in 2018, Collins ended up canceling a $100 million study to assess the effects of moderate alcohol consumption after it was discovered that the NIH had inappropriately solicited money for the study directly from the spirits industry, and had designed the study “to satisfy industry interests.” In 2018, a congressional spending panel also warned the FNIH and the CDC Foundation that their disclosures of financial donations were inadequate. As reported by Science at the end of June 2018: “Congress created the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) and the CDC Foundation … to raise private funds to support federal biomedical and health research. It hoped to encourage transparency and prevent potential conflicts of interest by specifying in the law that the foundations had to report ‘the source and amount of all gifts they receive,’ as well as any restrictions on how the donations could be used. But last week, legislators on the House of Representatives appropriations subcommittee that oversees NIH and CDC expressed concern that the foundations may not be following those disclosure rules…The lawmakers also say it’s not OK to hide the identity of donors who have attached strings to their gift by labeling them as ‘anonymous.’” Among the “anonymous” donors to the FNIH in 2016 were the Gates Foundation, despite having given a sizeable $19.1 million grant.

The reason for having a BlackRock representative on the FNIH’s board of directors could potentially have something to do with the globalists’ plan to monopolize health systems worldwide, which is a plan that is taking place presently. In June 2021, Gerberding, now head of the FNIH, wrote a Time article laying out the framework for an international pandemic- surveillance network, which would include threat prediction and preemption as well. While Gerberding did not name the World Health Organization, we now know that’s the organization designated as the top-down ruler, not only of all things related to plandemics but also health in general. We need to realize how bought and paid for our U.S. regulatory agencies are, and figure out a way to clean up that mess. There has been a revolving door between government and private industry for decades, which is how we got here in the first place. Closing that door may be a step in the right direction. The “den of thieves,” the NIH, CDC, and FDA, are all so thoroughly infiltrated by industry. It will be a difficult task to restore them to their intended functions. Disturbingly, the same technocratic powers that are working to give the WHO global power over global health have also infiltrated these U.S. agencies. May Yahweh bless all and be well!

Story Covered By: Ed J. Janicki