THE COMPANY OF WOLVES – Chapter 4 – The Purge: Suppression of Honest Media

May 13, 2022

300

CHAPTER FOUR

The Purge: Suppression of Honest Media

“All this was done while the RINO Republican Party, which controlled the House for two years, and the Senate for four years, did nothing. Freedom of speech is now almost completely gone in America. The Biden Presidency is eliminating it totally.”

THE COMPANY OF WOLVES – Index

After the 2016 election defeat, the Democrats put together a plan to destroy the new media (i.e. entities like NemosNewsNetwork.com) which helped share President Trump’s message before the election. Their plan, endorsed and disseminated by Soros-funded Media Matters65, was to obliterate and bankrupt every successful new media outlet which shared politically controversial truth or information supportive of President Trump – in other words, ALL dissenting opinion or facts.

The Gateway Pundit first reported on the 2017 David Brock Media Matters Playbook66 that was accidentally found and leaked online. Inside the 2017 playbook Media Matters admits they had already secured access67 to raw data from the tech giants.

“Media Matters has already secured access to raw data from Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites. We have also put in place the technology necessary to automatically mine white nationalist message boards and alt-right communities for our archive. We will now develop technologies and processes to systematically monitor and analyze this unfiltered data.”

Media Matters goes on to describe how they found a way to manipulate the social media giants into thinking that they need their help. The following excerpt from the #BrockGate document speaks to this concern with detail:

“Outlets that push fake news are completely dependent on Facebook to spread their lies, and ad networks like Google to fund them. Media Matters has unique insight to help fix the problems in this part of the media landscape. After Facebook responded to our campaign by acknowledging the problem of fake news and agreeing to do something about it, we began a dialogue. It became clear from these conversations that Facebook needed our help in fully understanding the problem and identifying concrete solutions. Further, it also became clear that we had information and insight that they didn’t have that was helpful in educating them on the full scope of the problem. For example, Media Matters had a detailed map of the constellation of right-wing Facebook pages that had been the biggest purveyors of fake news – as well as insight into the food chain of fake news and how it was moving through the Facebook ecosystem. Similarly, after Google revised their terms of service in order to prohibit so-called fake news sites from using their advertising network, it was Media Matters that had the information necessary to identify 40 of the worst fake news sites to which this policy applied.”

In February of 2018 Facebook launched a new algorithm68 that ensured that conservative news would not spread on their social media platform. The algorithm change caused President Donald Trump’s engagement on Facebook posts to plummet an unbelievable 45%69. Democrat political leaders suffered no such reductions. Facebook uses Soros-funded Poynter70 to fact-check on their platform — The same group that lists EVERY prominent conservative publisher71 as fake news.

Facebook has been throttling or blocking traffic72 to conservative websites since the 2016 election. In March 2017 Columbia Journalism Review73 published a study of the 2016 election that showed conservatives had abandoned the liberal mainstream media in 2016 and went to the internet and to social media to get their news. Harvard University published a similar study74 months later.

Numerous individuals have had their accounts taken down by Twitter which shadow-bans and censors pro-Trump accounts, misrepresents the number of followers and responses to tweets, and adds disclaimers to tweets. In one glaring example, President Trump, with more than 85 million followers, rarely received more than 15,000 retweets to his individual tweets. This is comparable to other accounts with less than a half a million followers. To view the President’s tweets. a follower had to go to his account because his tweets were not shared. This deboosting and shadowbanning happens to many, if not all, effective conservative accounts. Twitter even took down numerous tweets the President shared. It goes without saying that anyone still allowed on Twitter, or allowed to have higher interaction with their audience than proportional with actual censored individuals – is likely controlled opposition.

Facebook stopped freely sharing conservative posts shortly after the election. Individuals might share a conservative article but the article would never reach their followers on Facebook. If it actually did reach them it would be buried in the individual’s timeline.

Google manipulates nearly all searches. If you pull up questions related to President Trump, the information comes from far-left radical sites like CNN, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, Politico and other far-left media outlets with bogus reports. Searches on almost any topic positive towards President Trump are manipulated or directed to the hateful left wing sites. Searches of conservative sites will bring up rearguard liberal fact-checker articles that disparage real media continuously. The same is rarely, if ever, done for pro-Hillary or Biden sites.

All this was done while the RINO Republican Party, which controlled the House for two years, and the Senate for four years, did nothing. Freedom of speech is now almost completely gone in America. The Biden Presidency is eliminating it totally.

Big Tech is going to further interfere with future elections by implementing these devious methods and potentially other unknown measures to further prevent Republicans and President Trump from winning elections ever again.

FACEBOOK

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg openly announced on HBO’s Axios that “What we and the other media need to start doing is preparing the American people that there is nothing illegitimate about this election taking additional days or weeks to make sure all the votes are counted.” He said this while investing 5 million dollars in mail-in dropboxes (and harvesting personnel) in Georgia. What part of this did NOT influence the Georgia election outcome?

Prior to this Facebook shared other anti-Trump policies, as MSNBC tweeted out on September 11, 2020. “Facebook will ban new political ads for the week leading up to Election Day in the US, and remove posts that try to suppress or discourage voting, Mark Zuckerberg announced Thursday.”

This policy only hurts Republicans and Donald Trump. For the week before the election, only pro-Biden messages were shared on social media from the mainstream Biden-loving media while Trump wasn’t even allowed to even buy ads to share his message.

TWITTER

On September 10th 2020 CNN published the article called “Twitter expands rules against election-related misinformation, setting up showdown with Trump”, an excerpt follows:

“Twitter announced Thursday that it is expanding its policies against election-related misinformation, setting new rules that will likely force the platform to more aggressively fact-check President Donald Trump during the final months of the 2020 campaign.

The social media giant rolled out the new policies in a blog post, which said that Twitter (TWTR) will either add fact-check labels to or hide altogether tweets that contain “false or misleading information that causes confusion” about election rules, or posts with “unverified information about election rigging.””

GOOGLE

Tech giant Google announced that it would manipulate search parameters to prevent users from finding answers to their election questions after the election:

On September 10, 2020, CNBC published an article titled 75 “Google says it will block autocomplete for searches that suggest voting outcomes” . In it, they reported:

“Google said Thursday that it will remove search autocomplete predictions that “could be interpreted as claims for or against any candidate or political party.” It’ll also remove statements about voting methods and the status of voting locations as well as the legitimacy of elections including security of the election.

Google autocomplete recommends searches based on what a user is typing into the search box in a Chrome browser or on Google.com.

“We want to be very careful about those sorts of predictions,” David Graff, Google’s senior director of trust and safety, told reporters on a press call ahead of the announcement Thursday. “This election, people will have strong opinions, and given the backdrop of Covid-19, the change with elections is to be more conservative in terms of queries.”

The policy update comes as Google, among other firms like Facebook and Twitter which are trying to cut down on misinformation, prepares for a heated presidential election.

The company gave examples of phrases it’ll block such as a prediction that says “donate to” any party or candidate, or predictions like “you can vote by phone” as well as “you can’t vote by phone.”

“It’s been fairly unprecedented — the scale of information challenges particularly with Covid,” said Cathy Edwards, vice president of engineering at Google. “We don’t want to have policy changes on Election Day,” she added. “That’s a goal for us, certainly.”

The company said it has an “Intelligence Desk,” which is a global team of analysts monitoring news events 24 hours a day. The same desk has been monitoring claims about Covid treatments. The group will keep a close eye on Election Day to prevent too early election outcomes from appearing in search, Google said.”