THE COMPANY OF WOLVES – Chapter 3 – Before the Steal: Interference, Fraud & Hypocrisy



Before the Steal: Interference, Fraud & Hypocrisy

Ironically, before 2020, Democrats were some of the strongest supporters of election reform, casting serious doubts on our national and state election systems as well as the companies( like Dominion)that service them. Secretary of State Warner said, “We want everyone to be tuned into the increased opportunities for fraud. Voting absentee makes it easy to vote, but increases opportunities for irregularities and fraud to occur. If you see something, say something.”


Ironically, before 2020, Democrats were some of the strongest supporters of election reform, casting serious doubts on our national and state election systems as well as the companies( like Dominion)that service them.

Secretary of State Warner said, “We want everyone to be tuned into the increased opportunities for fraud. Voting absentee makes it easy to vote, but increases opportunities for irregularities and fraud to occur. If you see something, say something.”

In 2019 Senators Warren, Klobuchar, Wyden, and congressman Mark Pocan were upset about Dominion voting.  They were so upset that they sent them a letter.

The four congressional Democrats sent a letter to the owners of Dominion and cited several problems that “threaten the integrity of our elections,” including “vote switching” in the December 2019 letter to Dominion Voting Systems. 24 

In their letter to Dominion,25 the Senators expressed their concerns with the company, stating:

“…if you do not manage the vendors, they will manage you.” and warning about reports of machines “switching votes,” “undisclosed vulnerabilities,” and “improbable” results that “threaten the integrity of our elections.”

Senators Elizabeth Warren (D), Amy Klobuchar (D) & Ron Wyden (D) even issued a formal complaint in 2019 to Dominion Voting Systems.


There is a security video27 that captures 240 ballot traffickers in Georgia.  Each of these traffickers averaged 23-24 drops where they would empty backpacks into the ballot boxes. This is completely illegal. No harvesting is allowed in Georgia. Catherine Engelbrecht and True the Vote are behind the investigation and it involves SEVERAL STATES.

According to a leaked document, True The Vote has spent several months since late last 2020 collecting more than 27 terabytes of geospatial and temporal data—a total of 10 trillion cell phone pings—between Oct. 1 and Nov. 6 in targeted areas in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wisconsin. This data includes geofenced locations of importance in the elections like ballot dropbox locations, as well as UPS stores and select government, commercial, and non-governmental organization (NGO) facilities.


“From this we have thus far developed precise patterns of life for 242 suspected ballot traffickers in Georgia and 202 traffickers in Arizona,” True The Vote’s document says… “According to the data, each trafficker went to an average of 23 ballot dropboxes.”

In other words, the document says that True The Vote was able to take cell phone ping data on a mass scale and piece together that several people—suspected ballot harvesters—were making multiple trips to multiple drop boxes, raising legal concerns in a number of these states.

From there, the document continues, True The Vote gathered surveillance video on the drop boxes in Georgia and is attempting to gather similar such surveillance video from other states. The document states that True The Vote has obtained one full petabyte of surveillance footage on drop boxes—two million minutes of video—which it says is broken into 73,000 individual video files. These files purportedly show the same people going multiple times to the same drop boxes repeatedly.


Hans von Spakovsky, the manager of the Heritage Foundation’s Election Law Reform Initiative said that in Arizona, Nevada, and Wisconsin, unaccounted for ballots outnumber the margin of victory. Wisconsin had a margin of 20,682 votes November, 2020. Wisconsin lost track of 82,000 mail-in ballots.


Spakovsky told Breitbart’s Alex Marlow28, “[The Wisconsin Election Commission] said 6,500 absentee ballots they mailed out were sent back by the postal service as ‘undeliverable’ [and] 3,000 ballots that came back were rejected. They don’t say why, but usually [a ballot is rejected] because, for example, the signature doesn’t match, indicating it may have been a fraudulent ballot,” he remarked.

Wisconsin authorities cannot account for 76,000 ballots, von Spakovsky stated. “They don’t know what happened to them…” he said. “In other words, voters requested an absentee ballot, or (Wisconsin officials) simply decided — in some places in Wisconsin — to simply mail out absentee ballots to everybody, and the ballot never came back, so it’s unaccounted for. These are the official numbers of the election commission (in Wisconsin), and we don’t know what happened to them. We don’t know if [the ballots] got lost (or) if they were stolen and somebody didn’t get to vote.”

“This didn’t just happen in Wisconsin. … The margin of victory in Arizona for Joe Biden was only a little over 10,000 votes. Maricopa County alone has admitted that they sent 110,000 mail-in or absentee ballots to what turned out to be the wrong addresses.” he continued.


“They were labeled [and] returned as ‘undeliverable’ by the postal service,” he added. “Same thing in Nevada. … Clark County sent out something like 93,000 mail-in ballots that are unaccounted for. In other words, they mailed it out [and] it never came back. We don’t know what happened to them, and remember, the margin of victory in the entire state was only a little over 33,000 ballots.”


“There are literally tens of thousands of ballots out there floating around, and we don’t know what happened to them,” he concluded.  Almost 15 million mail-in votes have “gone unaccounted for,” according to the report by the Indiana-based election integrity group, ”Public Interest Legal Foundation” (PILF). This is the result of mass mail-in ballots in a scheme that the elections offices around the Country, as well as another example of how COVID-19 was used to steal the election.

How can Democrats claim this was “the most secure election in history” when they don’t even know who received the ballots? Or whether returned mail-in ballots were voted on by real authorized voters…

On October 09, 2020, The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued Alert (AA20-283A) APT Actors Chaining Vulnerabilities Against SLTT, Critical Infrastructure, and Elections Organizations,  An excerpt from the summary follows:

“This joint cybersecurity advisory was written by CISA with contributions from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). 

CISA has recently observed advanced persistent threat (APT) actors exploiting multiple legacy vulnerabilities in combination with a newer privilege escalation vulnerability – CVE-2020-1472 29– in Windows Netlogon. The commonly used tactic, known as vulnerability chaining, exploits multiple vulnerabilities in the course of a single intrusion to compromise a network or application. 

This recent malicious activity has often, but not exclusively, been directed at federal and state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) government networks. Although it does not appear these targets are being selected because of their proximity to elections information, there may be some risk to elections information housed on government networks.

CISA is aware of some instances where this activity resulted in unauthorized access to elections support systems; however, CISA has no evidence to date that integrity of elections data has been compromised. There are steps that election officials, their supporting SLTT IT staff, and vendors can take to help defend against this malicious cyber activity.”

On October 14th, Fox News picked up on it as well, reporting:30

 “Hackers, possibly nation-state actors, have penetrated U.S. government networks and accessed election systems, the FBI and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) said in a joint alert.

In some cases, there was unauthorized access to election support systems, CISA added.

CISA did intimate that election system data could be compromised, noting “there are steps that election officials, their supporting … IT staff, and vendors can take to help defend against this malicious cyber activity.”

Hackers got access via a combination of vulnerabilities – what CISA calls “vulnerability chaining.” It is a commonly used tactic and in this case targeted federal and state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) government networks, critical infrastructure, and elections organizations.

The hackers targeted a Virtual Private Network (VPN) vulnerability and a flaw in Netlogon, a Windows protocol to authenticate users.

The alert did not state explicitly who the bad actors were, only referring to them as “advanced persistent threat (APT) actors.” But that is a term often reserved for state-sponsored hacking groups, according to experts.”

Fired Director of Cyber Security, Chris Krebs, told31 the US Senate Homeland Security Committee on December 16, 2020 that some Dominion Voting Machines were connected to the internet despite previous statements to the contrary.

Yet Krebs insisted the 2020 election was the most secure ever before he was fired.

Senator Johnson:

“…but those tabulators are connected on Election Day ’cause that’s how they transmit the data to the counties and also into the official — uhm –“


“In some cases, yes, sir.”

On December 24th (2020) – In an interview with Zenger News – Sidney Powell claimed32 that the president’s aides were preventing her from being in contact with President Trump and coordinating his efforts to fight for election integrity in battleground states around the country.

 Powell recounted she had heard only radio silence from the White House following her historic Friday night meeting with the president in the Oval Office on December 18th, confirming she was unable to speak to Trump when she visited the White House on Sunday, the 20th.

“I’ve been blocked from speaking to or communicating with the president since I left the Oval Office on Friday night,” Powell told Zenger’s David Martsoko, “by apparently everyone around him.”

Powell also claimed she had been verbally offered the position of “special counsel” by Trump during Friday’s meeting, but had been unable to present him with paperwork to make it official.

Newsweek added:

By Saturday morning, Powell says, the president’s most senior aides had declined to give her a Secret Service-issued pass to come and go from the West Wing. “I’ve been blocked from speaking to or communicating with the president since I left the Oval Office on Friday night,” she says, “by apparently everyone around him.”


An email later discovered after the election shows that Claire Woodall-Vogg, the executive director for elections in Milwaukee was joking about likely criminal election activities that led to a vote dump of over 143,000 ballots all marked for Joe Biden early in the morning of November 4th, the morning after the 2020 Election.

This email, was first posted at Wisconsin Spotlight33 shows her responding to the following message:

Damn, Claire, you have a flair for drama, delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am.  I bet you had those votes counted at midnight, and just wanted to keep the world waiting.”

Claire’s response: “Lol. I just wanted to wait to say I had been awake for a full 24 hours!”

Claire’s correspondent, Ryan Chew, is from The Elections Group34.This group is connected to George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.  The Elections Group was present during the election steal in Georgia and Morrell was even one of the observers selected by Katie Hobbs in Arizona to review the Senate’s election audit in Maricopa County.

Jennifer Morrell and ‘The Elections Group’ were all over the 2020 Election steal35. This group was involved in Georgia, were heavily involved in criticizing the Arizona audit, and are a major component in the Deep State ‘nonprofits’ behind the 2020 election sham. The Elections Group was founded by Jennifer Morrell and Noah Praetz in 2020, according to their webpage. Not only did The Elections Group make it into the election process in Fulton County Georgia, we also know, thanks to Influence Watch, that Morrell worked with the CISA – the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency36

Three of The Elections Group’s six nonprofit and academic “Partners” are:

  • the Center for Tech and Civic Life: major “Zuckerbucks” nonprofit connection;
  • National Vote at Home Institute: one of Zuckerbucks nonprofit connections;
  • Center for Civic Design: one of Zuckerbucks nonprofit connections.

During the Audit in Maricopa County, Morrell and Praetz both signed the April 22 letter to Arizona Senate President Karen Fann37

 In this letter from the Brennan Group of far-left nonprofits, the Democrats are requesting that the Arizona Senate stop their audit.


Morrell is also a consultant for the Democracy Fund38, [just put in ONE hyperlink to cover the previous 3 links] a left leaning advocacy foundation funded by left-leaning eBay billionaire Pierre Omidyar and a heavy donor to Zuckerbucks. The Democracy Fund is a major funding mechanism for much of the election mischief that went on in 2020. In 2018, the Democracy Fund hired Morrell to consult as the director of its Election Validation Project. The project was described by the Democracy Fund as an effort to increase public trust in elections by supporting rigorous audits, standards, and testing. Morrell and the Democracy Fund describe the desire to implement their chosen policies around election administration nationally by implementing “a uniform set of audit standards that go beyond auditing ballot tabulation equipment.”

Morrell published a report through Democracy Fund titled “Knowing It’s Right: A Practical Guide to Risk-Limiting Audits” which guides states through the process of performing an audit. Communications from the Election Validation Project allude to the debunked Russian Collusion Delusion of alleged interference in the 2016 election by Russia. In her report, Morrell states “As we work through reestablishing trust in our elections following Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 22-month long investigation, the threat of interference in our elections by another nation-state remains.

Pierre Omidyar39 is closely tied into the George Soros world. He also is a donor to the Brennan Center.

Members of some of the Democrat’s most connected non-profits also met with UN officials before the 2020 election. The same groups later tried to derail the audits moving forward across the nation.

Harri Hursti, Ph.D., election cybersecurity expert and computer scientist, and Elizabeth Howard, Esq., Cybersecurity and Elections Counsel at the radical Brennan Center for Justice in Manhattan, gave a briefing on election cybersecurity to a U.N. committee40 of international election observers in Washington, D.C., just three days before the U.S midterm elections in 2018.

Hursti was later in the news after being selected as one of three auditors in the partisan “fraudit” team selected by New Hampshire officials. Hursti’s fellow auditors who picked him for the job have ties to both Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D). This group “audited” the Town of Windham’s 2020 election and, after observing that team’s unprofessional practices, citizens are now demanding a statewide forensic audit of all of NH’s elections.

Liz Howard, like Marc Elias from DNC-favorite Perkins Coie, is one of the elite Democrat fixers, an activist election attorney the far-left deploys whenever problematic election issues of the national Democratic machine need fixing. She was one of the three observers that Soros-backed Arizona Secretary of State (SoS) Katie Hobbs (D) deployed to the Veterans Memorial Coliseum, site of the Arizona Senate’s forensic audit, to be her spy.

Howard was one of the signers of an April 29, 2021 viciously deceptive nonprofit letter41 of complaint to the Election Section, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice. This was one of four such attack letters sent by Democrat-co-opted U.S. nonprofits, led by Perkins Coie on April 6, to harass Arizona Senate President Karen Fann (R), three of which Howard personally signed42. Joe Schaeffer of the World Tribune, in his November 8, 2020, exposé of nonprofits, showed Soros-funded organizations have assisted with election security in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and exposed the Brennan Center and its radical attorneys as being “tethered to the Soros spider web” of co-opted U.S. nonprofits.

Why were Elizabeth Howard  and Harri Hursti together briefing a room full of U.N. international election “observers” about election cybersecurity? These same people traveled across the U.S. (three days later), collecting data about our mid-term elections for the U.N.?

The U.N. committee in question is the OSCE PA43/ODIHR chaired by Isabel Santos. This stands for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly/the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, which “established a Limited Election Observation Mission (LEOM) to observe the 6 November 2018 mid-term congressional elections.”

A report from the OSCE PA / ODIHR states it was invited in by the government of the United States of America. The U.S. State Department, out of “respect for its relevant international obligations and OSCE commitments,” stated its commitment to assisting this committee during an April 12th, 2018 address to the U.N. Permanent Council located in Vienna.

Unsurprisingly to many, our own U.S. Mission to the OSCE44 reads right out of Soros’ globalist playbook, “The United States strongly supports the work of the OSCE and views it as the paramount instrument for building a region of stable, open societies in which every country lives at peace with its neighbors.”

The ODIHR45 describes itself thus:

“OSCE’s principal institution to assist participating States ‘to ensure full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, to abide by the rule of law, to promote principles of democracy and (…) to build, strengthen and protect democratic institutions, as well as promote tolerance throughout society’ (1992 Helsinki Summit Document). This is referred to as the OSCE human dimension.”

The ODIHR, which conducts these election observation missions, “assess[es] compliance of the election process with OSCE commitments and other international obligations and standards for democratic elections” and “observes elections, reviews legislation and advises governments on how to develop and sustain democratic institutions.”

What “international obligations and standards” for “democratic elections” established by this U.N. committee are Democrats trying to subjugate and obligate America to do? This “committee” even reviews and “advises” on our own federal and states’ election laws.  The LEOM team consisted of “a 14-member core team based in Washington D.C. and 36 long-term observers.”

It was joined by “an 83-member delegation of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly to form an International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) … In total, the IEOM deployed 136 observers from 34 OSCE participating States and one Partner for Cooperation.”

The U.N. committee’s literature and its 2018 reports about U.S. elections are replete with the term “civil society” which, like the term “open society” should give you great pause.

It also, coincidentally, shares many of the same progressive election reform goals which far-left Democrats have been busy pushing for and even implementing all across America. In fact, its overall recommendations for the U.S. elections’ processes reads like a wish list of the Democrat-controlled “election integrity” nonprofits.

It appears the OSCE PA regularly deploys these international “observer delegation[s] for election day observation” to all of OSCE’s participating nations, to make sure they are following the U.N. approved methods for their elections.

Of course, we, in the United States, have a Constitutional Republic46 form of government, not a democracy. But it will only survive “if you can keep it.”

The ODIHR claims to be highly credible in the field, yet in the 2018 OSCE PA ODIHR 2018 report it had footnoted examples of alleged egregious pre-election statements by candidates which singled out, almost exclusively, President Donald Trump and Republican candidates!

In that same report, as examples of “active grassroots movements” leading to increased participation in elections, it actually listed “Black Lives Matter”, “#MeToo”, and “March for Our Lives”, all radical, and in some cases, violent, far-left movements. They outright ignored all Conservative activity completely.

This U.N. report is pushing for Washington, D.C. to be granted state status. In addition, it is a public relations attempt of the National Popular Vote Act47, a move by radical Democrats and Communists to do away with the electoral college entirely and elect future U.S. presidents via the easily corruptible popular vote. Approved by 16 states’ legislatures and Washington D.C., the NPVA would irreparably destroy an essential aspect of our Constitution and our election process.

These big mouthed yet unobservant “observers”, called “interlocutors” by the U.N., many socialist-leaning themselves, have been almost exclusively influenced by Democrats, and their socialist and communist allies from within the United States.

So who, from within the government of the United States of America, invited this international election team to mess around in our elections? And why did they come back in 2020?

Officially, it was the United States Mission to the OSCE, backed by the Department of State, which invited this U.N. team. Buried within the reports, however, we find that it was two nonprofits that were singled out for special recognition by ODIHR in the text of the report: the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) and the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED). The only other entity singled out for thanks was the US Dept. of State.

“The ODIHR LEOM wishes to thank the authorities of the United States for the invitation to observe the elections, and the Department of State, the National Association of Secretaries of States, and the National Association of State Election Directors for their assistance.”

Additionally, the committee even met with NASS and NASED officials when it did its Needs Assessment Mission from May 21-25, 2018, again, the only non-governmental organizations to be thus singled out for recognition (p. 9) in the text of the report itself. 

“The ODIHR LEOM commenced its work in Washington, DC, on 3 October. The Head of Mission has met with the Department of State, Department of Justice, Federal Election Commission, National Association of Secretaries of State, National Association of State Election Directors, and members of the diplomatic community, among others.”

The report even cited a NASS resolution: “A National Association of Secretaries of State 2015 resolution welcomes ‘OSCE international election observers from the OSCE member countries to observe elections in states where allowed by state law’.”

This is shocking,given the extreme partisanship, blatant corruption, and even possibly criminal behavior of certain secretaries of state and election officials which has been revealed after the 2020 election. Also, it is NASS, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit “trade group” for secretaries of state (SoS) and NASED, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit “trade group” for election officials that appear to be the driving forces behind the U.N. “interlocutors”.

These outsiders from the U.N., with a far-left bias, were inside our borders, intimately examining our election systems, our election laws, our election equipment, our election cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and our very elections! 

Where does their money come from or flow to? Are they accepting foreign dollars and foreign contracts? How can we ever know? The activities of these two nonprofits, NASS and NASED – whether governmental or something else we don’t know about – fall outside of public oversight.

What are these quasi-governmental nonprofits doing behind the backs of the public? Are they, as required by law, remaining nonpartisan?  NASS’s board is made up entirely of elected secretaries of state. NASED’s board, likewise, is made up entirely of election officials, who may be chief election officers, but who are not secretaries of state.

With no checks & balances are enforced upon the activities of these two boards or the nonprofits themselves. They operate outside of public scrutiny. Both NASED and NASS are very late in submitting their IRS Form 990s, keeping the public in the dark about the little it can discern from these tax documents.  These two nonprofits represent all of the leadership which control all of our elections in every state in these (dis)United States.

Have they been co-opted or corrupted, as we’ve seen with so many other nonprofits in the United States? Or, what if just a handful of corrupted public election officials took control, or got control of the finances, what kind of activities might be happening in secret, that would evade detection?


Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in a February 8, 2020 speech warned about foreign influence and aggressive deal-making occurring through the National Governors Association, regarding Chinese influence and bribe schemes. Is it possible something similar could happen – is happening – here?


Joe Schaeffer from the World Tribune48 covered this story brilliantly on December 20, 2020, in his report Arizona Gov. Ducey to China: ‘Lots of opportunities to exploit ‘our defense industry, mining and ores’.


In Woodland Hills, California residents were not able to vote for any president at all, reports with images emerged of ballots without an option to vote for president! Propositions 21 and 22 were also listed twice on two different pages.

CBS Los Angeles reported50

“Millions of California ballots have been delivered to residents across the state as early voting begins for the 2020 general election, but some have gone to people who should no longer be registered to vote in the state.

A new study from the Election Integrity Project California has found that close to 400,000 ballots have been sent to people who moved or died.

“The fear is that people who are dishonest could vote those ballots and attempt to get them counted,” said Evelyn Swenson, who works with the organization. “What kind of confidence to the people of California have in the system when they’re getting ballots from their deceased loved one 10 years ago or someone who never lived there or someone who moved 10 years ago? That hurts the confidence in the election.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order51 on May 8, 2020 allowing all registered voters in the state to receive a mail-in ballot for November’s election, paving the way for a massive cheat with all those extra ballots floating around.


Thousands of Ballots disappeared52 In Butler County, which voted for President Donald Trump over Democrat rival Hillary Clinton in 2016 about 66 percent to 29 percent and is located north of Pittsburgh and has approximately 150,000 registered voters.


A local county official, Aaron Sheasley, told CNN53 that the county had received more than 10,000 phone calls about information related to the ballots that were requested but not received.

“Somewhere between the post office and the Pittsburgh sorting facility something happened.Sheasley told the network. We don’t know what.”  

He added:

“We haven’t given out any numbers” about the number of missing ballots “because we simply don’t know.”

Speaking to CNN, Chuck Bugar, president of the American Postal Workers Union-Pittsburgh chapter, said there is no record that suggests the missing ballots in Butler County made it to a Postal Service facility.

“There’s no pile of ballots that have been taken from the Butler County election committee that are sitting around,” Bugar said.

“There’s no record or indication that they entered the mail stream. There’s paperwork that goes along with it.”

DOJ Democrats also paid Pennsylvania Election Officials to stuff ballot boxes.

A former Judge of Elections in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was even charged and pled guilty to illegally adding votes for Democrat candidates in judicial races in 2014, 2015, and 2016.

On May 21st the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced54 charges against former Judge of Elections Domenick DeMuro, 73, for stuffing the ballot box for Democrats in exchange for payment.

The charges to which he plead guilty included conspiracy to deprive Philadelphia voters of their civil rights by fraudulently stuffing ballot boxes for specific Democrat party candidates in the 2014, 2015, and 2016 primary elections and a violation of the Travel Act.

“The Trump administration’s prosecution of election fraud stands in stark contrast to the total failure of the Obama Justice Department to enforce these laws,” said a statement released by Public Interest Legal Foundation President Christian Adams. 

“Right now, other federal prosecutors are aware of cases of double voting in federal elections as well as noncitizen voting. Attorney General William Barr should prompt those other offices to do their duty and prosecute known election crimes.”

As Judge of Elections, DeMuro oversaw the election process in Ward 39, which encompasses Philadelphia.

DeMuro’s guilty plea states that he was paid by a “political consultant” to unlawfully add votes for particular Democrat candidates in primary judicial races. The political consultant who allegedly paid DeMuro had been hired by those same Democrat candidates.

According to the indictment, this political consultant allegedly solicited payments from Democrat candidates who hired him, classifying them as “consulting fees.” These payments, which ranged from $300 to as much as $5,000, were then allegedly used to bribe Election Board Officials such as DeMuro, in exchange for those officials adding votes for the consultants’ Democrat candidates.

DeMuro admitted that he unlawfully added votes for Democrats on Election Day and then certified later that the counted votes were accurate.

“DeMuro fraudulently stuffed the ballot box by literally standing in a voting booth and voting over and over, as fast as he could, while he thought the coast was clear,” U.S. Attorney William McSwain said in a statement. “This is utterly reprehensible conduct. The charges announced today do not erase what he did, but they do ensure that he is held to account for those actions.”

The criminal complaint is in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case number is 2:20-cr-00112-PD55.

Texas Mayoral candidate Zul Mohamed, 39, was arrested October 8, 2020 night and charged with 109 counts of voter fraud. Zul Mohamed (D) was running to become Mayor of Carrollton, just north of Dallas, before getting caught in a mail-in ballot scheme.

Fox News reported56:

“A Texas mayoral candidate was arrested Wednesday night and faces felony voter fraud charges after allegedly sending 84 applications for mail-in ballots.

Zul Mohamed, who’s running to become the mayor of Carrollton, a city roughly one hour north of Dallas, was charged with 25 counts of knowingly possessing a ballot with intent to defraud, a second-degree felony, and 84 counts of providing false info on a voting application, a third-degree felony, according to the Texas attorney general’s office

“Voter fraud is a serious and widespread issue and cannot be tolerated,” Denton County Sheriff Tracey Murphree said in a statement. “The fact an actual candidate for public office would engage in these activities is appalling. We will continue to aggressively investigate allegations of voter fraud.””

This was far from the only incident in Texas, another noteworthy mention is when Project Veritas released undercover footage57 of a ballot chaser admitting to conducting massive voter fraud to help elect Joe Biden.

The video was part of a bombshell undercover investigation into a Texas “Republican” consultant who was busted on camera violating both state and federal laws by bribing and coercing voters into voting for Democrats, which was released on October 27, 202058.

In the undercover video, Raquel Rodriguez, a consultant for GOP House candidate Mauro Garza, admitted that she will be making around $55,000 to change 5,000 votes, as rigging the election will cost “five to eight dollars per vote.” She also admitted that “some of my Republicans are precinct chairs that cannot be known… they want to help Biden.”  Rodriguez admitted that she was getting paid to help Republicans who wanted to flip votes for Biden, saying “yeah, that’s what I’m doing. That’s exactly what I’m getting paid to do.”

In the video, Rodriguez was seen providing a gift to an elderly woman after coercing her into changing her vote and even helping her change the ballot.

“Now, you know on here you chose a Republican, not a Democrat, right?” Raquel Rodriguez tells the voter.

The voter responds, “Can I do that?”

Rodriguez replies, “You can do, you can vote for whoever you want. But our conversation that we had, you said you were voting for Hegar because you were going straight Democrat.”

Rodriguez is even seen on camera taking the ballot from the voter and helping her fill it out.

Further on, Rodriguez admitted that what she was doing was illegal and even bragged about giving the elderly voter a pretty shawl as a gift for her Democrat vote!

“That’s illegal. I could go to jail,” Rodriguez told the Project Veritas undercover journalist. “If I go to prison, I do not look cute in stripes…I will hate you forever.”



In Franklin County, Ohio, 49,66959 voters out of 237,498 (just over 20%) received ballots which contained an incorrect congressional race. Others, which had the correct information, were mistakenly mailed to voters in the wrong precinct, according to Politico which reported on this:

“The process to print, stuff the replacement ballots in envelopes and mail them was underway Friday, the Franklin County Elections Board announced.

The board also said it will mail postcards to all affected voters detailing the situation and highlighting voters’ options moving forward. Those options include voting in-person at the board’s offices on the city’s north side.

The elections board said multiple checks are in place to ensure only one voter can cast a ballot, including rejecting any replacement ballots if someone went ahead and voted in person.”

President Trump tweeted out:

“Breaking News: 50,000 OHIO VOTERS getting WRONG ABSENTEE BALLOTS. Out of control. A Rigged Election!!!”

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 9, 2020 

Notably, Ohio’s elections chief also announced that the state’s 88 elections boards had a record number of applications for absentee ballots – 2,154,235 vs. 1,091,188 in 2016. 

New Hampshire

When many New Hampshire voters received fake ballots60

 in the mail with personal notes attached encouraging New Hampshire voters to turn in the bogus document.

Republican New Hampshire Attorney General Gordon MacDonald released this statement on the issue.


“Concord, NH – Attorney General Gordon J. MacDonald issues the following alert to New Hampshire voters.

The Attorney General’s Office has been notified that some New Hampshire residents have received unidentified mailers containing an absentee ballot application form with an allegedly hand written note. The message on the note states, “You are needed please fill this out and mail it in.” The mailer also contains a return envelope with the recipient’s town or city clerk in the address block.

An example of this unidentified mailer is attached. State law requires that a mailing such as this contain the identity of the entity mailing and distributing the form. No such identification accompanies the attached mailer.

The Attorney General’s Office has received inquiries from election officials and voters regarding this mailer. Voters should be aware that these unidentified mailers have not been sent by New Hampshire town or city clerks. These unidentified mailers have not been sent by any State agency.

Voters receiving this unidentified mailer who have already requested and/or submitted an absentee ballot need not complete another absentee ballot application form. Voters can check the status of their absentee ballot here:…”



Hidden #DetroitLeaks audio emerged61 from an anonymous source who took the election work training classes in Detroit, Michigan. The audio, posted on YouTube, revealed that election workers were trained to try to kick out poll watchers and anyone who challenges any ballot. 


“They have to wear a mask, and they have to stay six feet. That’s important because if you don’t have six feet, they can’t come back there,” advises the instructor, who then says that a person standing six feet away from the ballots can’t even see what is going on in order to verify any signatures, “Unless they got really good vision or they brought their binoculars.”

Trainees were told that the number one thing people would scrutinize were the absentee ballots and the solution to someone challenging an absentee ballot was to call 911. “If they make a scene, get ’em up out of there. Call the police on ’em.”

This is a violation of Michigan Compiled Laws 168.73362, which specifically states that “The board of election inspectors shall provide space for the challengers within the polling place that enables the challengers to observe the election procedure and each person applying to vote.” Section (4) of the law specifies “A person shall not threaten or intimidate a challenger while performing an activity allowed under subsection.“

The training session then went on to explain what a worker should do with a challenged ballot. The instructor advised trainees to put the ballot in the tabulator, which is the machine that actually counts the votes, and run it as if it were not challenged!  Meaning the vote would be counted by default. This likely renders the challenged ballot unchallengeable because once it goes into the machine it becomes anonymous and cannot be traced or tracked. Anyone can access the master list of voters in Michigan, which provides names, addresses, and precinct information for every voter. This means anyone could show up claiming to be someone they are not and give a name that matches one that is on the list.

The trainer then says if the person swears they did not vote absentee, to issue that person a provisional ballot, which goes into a special envelope that eventually just gets thrown out. So the person thinks they are casting their vote, when really it just goes into the garbage.


Notably, Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar allegedly carried out a ballot harvesting scheme in Minnesota63.


West Virginia

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, U.S. Attorney Bill Powell and Secretary of State Mac Warner announced a criminal charge against a rural mail carrier64 on May 26, 2020 in a voter fraud case related to absentee ballot requests. Thomas Cooper, 47, of Dry Fork, was charged with attempting to defraud the residents of West Virginia of a fair election. According to the West Virginia Attorney General, Cooper fraudulently altered 8 absentee ballot requests in Pendleton County by changing the party affiliation from Democrat to Republican.

Incidentally, earlier that same day President Trump had tweeted “There is NO WAY (ZERO) that mail-in ballots will be anything less than fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed.” Trump was right, yet again!

Missouri Senator Josh Hawley announced on December 30th, 2020 that he would object to the Electoral College certification process on January 6th.

Senator Hawley was the first Republican senator to release a statement on his intentions to decertify the fraudulent election results.

Following his announcement, Democrat Senator Amy Klobuchar hypocritically slammed Senator Hawley calling his actions a “coup attempt.” Before the 2020 election, her voice was among the loudest calling the election system in the United States as we cover later in this book.


Chapter Three Links




















































































In Case You Missed It:

Hidden History: They are Hiding God, the Firmament, & The Seed War (/w Guest Mark Sargent)

Mapping the Rabbit Holes

Nemos News is 100% listener funded. Thank you for your support in our mission to Break the Cycle of Fake News.

For breaking news from one of the most over the target and censored names in the world join our 100% Free newsletter at

Also follow us at Gab

If you value our work please consider supporting us with our vetted patriot sponsors!

Shop Patriot & Detox the Deep State with, Home of Sleepy Joe – the world’s most powerful all natural sleep formula & The Great Awakening Gourmet Coffee for Patriots.

“Our Specialty, is Waking People Up.”

Other Links

Join our Telegram chat: